Page not displaying properly?  Be sure to whitelist in your script or ad blocking software.  We do not run invasive scripts or third-party ads. X
      Lost Password?       e: p:
prayer   |   testimonies   |   store   |   give   |   contact
sign up secure log in
The Center for Moral Clarity Bridge of Hope Partners The Center for Moral Clarity Chrisitian Education World Harvest Ministerial Alliance World Harvest Church Give Today!
Religious–Liberty Case Could Have Widespread Impact
   Wednesday, April 19, 2017   at   9:31 AM

This Wednesday, April 19, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear a religious–liberties case, Trinity Lutheran v. Comer, that focuses on a playground on a church campus in Columbia, Mo., but could have widespread impact across the nation.

The court is at full strength this week for the first time in more than a year, thanks to the addition of Justice Neil Gorsuch earlier this month to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

The church is challenging a provision in the Missouri Constitution commonly called Blaine Amendment language. It’s based on 19th–century legislation that never became part of federal law (James Blaine was a former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Senator, and candidate for president from Maine in 1884). Legal analyst Nate Madden notes that the Blaine Amendment had its genesis in a time in U.S. history when anti–Catholic sentiment ran rampant in public policy.

Though not enacted at the federal level, versions of the law exist in more than 35 states. The law generally forbids any house of worship from receiving the same benefits the state may make available to secular organizations.

The case before the U.S. Supreme Court involves rubber crumbs made from recycled tires that the state of Missouri made available through a grant program for playgrounds. A state program made the crumbs available for playgrounds throughout Missouri, as a safer alternative to gravel or other ground cover.

Trinity Lutheran Church now operates a state–licensed preschool and day–care center that initially opened as a non–profit corporation in 1985. It sought the rubber crumbs for its playground under a grant program operated by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources. Though, according to Alliance Defending Freedom, the church initially qualified on merit for the grant, its application was denied under the state’s Blaine Amendment language. The church sued, claiming its exclusion violated the First Amendment guarantee of religion and speech as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The church lost at both the federal district court and the 8th Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals before the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to take the case in November 2015, before Scalia’s death. It’s clear that the high court scheduled hearings for as late in its term as possible in hopes of having a full complement of justices following the death of Scalia.

Madden notes that taken literally, the Blaine Amendment language can be problematic, to greatly understate the matter. If public funds can never be used to benefit a house of worship, does that mean that police cannot respond to a shooting at a church? If a fire breaks out at a synagogue or a mosque, is the local fire department barred from responding? Clearly not, and yet anti–religious zealots are claiming that the Blaine Amendment’s archaic language must be enforced over an issue, children’s safety, that at best only peripherally impacts the church’s religious mission.

One such zealot organization, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, claims that the case “threatens to disturb the healthy distance between religion and government.“ It also suggests, falsely, that if the church wins “state and local governments will be required to give taxpayer funds to churches, synagogues and mosques.” The truth is that if the church wins, houses of worship in Missouri and possibly in other states will no longer be unfairly disqualified for grant programs for which they otherwise qualify. Providing materials to make a playground safer can hardly be equated with government funding of a house of worship.

We believe this is a case in which a church clearly has common sense on its side. An archaic law that was likely enacted with discriminatory intent is standing in the way of the constitutional ideal of religious liberty.

It should be an easy case for the U.S. Supreme Court, and we hope that Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer becomes an important victory for houses of faith in this nation. We’ll be watching the case closely and anticipating the court’s decision, which should be released near the end of June.


Search Headlines

Headlines - See All
The First Amendment & Common Sense, Victorious at the U.S. Supreme Court
Planned Parenthood Celebrates Abortion & the Taxpayers Who Finance It
Ending Contraceptive Mandate for Religious Employers an Exercise in Common Sense
Justices Shouldn’t Walk Away from Setting Election–Reform Guidelines
Religious–Liberty Case Could Have Widespread Impact
Action Alert! Thank the Senate for Confirming Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court
Action Alert! Urge President Trump to Give States the Option to Defund Planned Parenthood
Action Alert! Insist on A Prompt, Positive Confirmation Vote for Judge Neil Gorsuch
Action Alert! Thank AG Jeff Sessions for Dropping Objection to Texas Voter ID Law
Action Alert! Thank President Donald Trump for Ending Regulations Accommodating Transgender Students
Action Alert! Ask Your U.S. Senators to Confirm Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court
Action Alert! Tell Your Member of Congress to Support an End to Abortion Funding
Now What? That Depends, on Us
site map   |   employment   |   Copyright � 2021 � World Harvest Church � All Rights Reserved.